Saturday, April 20, 2019

Virginia Woolf Articles!


Throughout the article titled Virginia Woolf on How to Read a Book the audience gains much wisdom from both the advice and insight given by Virginia Woolf. Upon analyzing the article, it is evident that Woolf explores the idea that when perusing through a book, the reader must use his/her mind as the sole tool to read a book. In addition, she emphasizes in her writing the importance of “coming to your own conclusion” when reading a book, by using your own instincts and lessons to guide a reader through the writing in a novel or book. It is vital to keep an open mind, she states, as one must not be hindered by new ideas and thoughts that the author provides. Aside from a holistic view on reading a novel, Woolf also highlights the importance of not “dictating your author.” Instead, she explains “try to become him.” As one who is currently reading her novel I take this advice giving seriously because it is difficult to understand the intricate detail of someone else’s writing without having my own judgment cloud Woolf’s novel To the Lighthouse. Moreover, the criticism that would hang over this book would “prevent [me] from getting the fullest possible value from what [I] read,” as Virginia Woolf elaborates upon the idea that we must keep clear minds when reading a book or novel. Another take away that I thought was particularly valuable to myself as a reader is that the author of the articles explains the idea that reading provides both an “intellectual and creative reward in itself.” As a reader, I personally can see the multitude of ways in which a book or novel has sparked some sort of creative in myself, whether that be subtle ideas embedded within the text or crucial plot points.
In addition to the article How to Read a Book, I found the article A Wave in the Mind: Virginia Woolf on Writing and Consciousness to be very interesting. Crowned with the title “one of humanity’s most beautiful minds and greatest masters of elegant, pleasurable language” Virginia Woolf was one of the first authors to grasp the idea that “style is the physiognomy of the mind.” In one of her letters she places emphasis on the importance of style and rhythm. However, what intrigued me as a reader, is that this rhythm is not sparked by structure or inadequate words, but rather by “a sight, [or] an emotion.” In essence, Woolf is entailing that rhythm is based upon the writer’s ability to feel, see, touch, taste… or in other worlds by one’s senses. I found this particularly interesting because Woolf goes deeper than just structure, she focuses on how one can feel and understand the rhythm of a book or novel without words even needed. 

Sunday, April 7, 2019

Is Hamlet Mad?

Throughout the play, Hamlet's actions have long been debated. Is he mad or are his actions justified? In my own opinion, I believe that his actions are triggered by specific events from his past, specifically, the fact that Hamlet's uncle murdered his father. However, after much thought regarding Hamlet's character, I think it is equally important to analyze how a human chooses to handle themselves when specific problems arise throughout a lifetime. While I believe "mad" might have a more negative connotation, I do believe we as readers/watchers can categorize Hamlet as a man who has mental instability.  It is evident that throughout the play, there are several instances where this mental instability is expressed. For example, when Hamlet fully discovers that his uncle Claudius murders his father. Losing a loved one impacts a person in ways unimaginable. Moreover, to have his mother re-marry his father's murderer could easily put him over the edge. Hamlets "madness" is displayed fully in the scene where Hamlet explains angrily to his mother the wrongdoings of Claudius. Because she reacted with fear, Polonius's call out for help from the curtain ultimately startles Hamlet enough to kill him with his sword. This specific action of killing Polonius specifically builds on the point that Hamlet is mad because he murdered a man without even knowing who he was (since he was hidden behind a curtain). Aside from this scene, his contemplation of life and death is another reason why we see that Hamlet is mad. Throughout his "To be or not to be" speech we gather that Hamlet debates committing suicide. Hamlet feels as though no one is listening to the truth he speaks, and I agree that if an entire population (including family) completely turned on me, I might be more likely to lash out just like Hamlet. For these reasons, I believe that while he most definitely is "mad" I can understand (to some extent) why he may act this way.

Saturday, March 9, 2019

Behind the curtain

Behind the curtain, who is there? Naturally, it is Polonius. His mysterious spying on Hamlet undoubtedly left him with a sword through his stomach. But what exactly does his death contribute to this play? Ultimately, this scene captures several emotions throughout the banter between the Queen and Hamlet. It is evident that Hamlet is desperately trying to enlighten the queen on her mischievous new husband. His temper and attitude toward exposing the King's connection to his father's murder have his mind spinning. The killing of Polonius is the climax of this show because Hamlet believed/ wish it had been the King behind the curtain, spying on this conversation. All his rage and fury regarding this very disjointed murder had been taking out during this time as though he spilled out everything he possibly could to the audience. I am interested to see how Hamlet will conspire again to try and expose the King for the murder of his father. I am also curious to see how and if the Queen will react to the news when this does happen. It is fascinating how naive a mature woman can be, especially a woman of such high ranking. Hopefully, she will come to terms with what Hamlet explains to her during this scene and that she will work with Hamlet to banish the King.

Advice to Ophelia

In my opinion, Laertes' and Polonius' advice to Ophelia reflects their overbearing and overprotective attitudes. It is clear that these two men lack the proper background on Hamlet and his feelings. They are repeating desire to emphasize that Hamlet is not good for her shows how Laertes and Polonius wish to be more involved in analyzing Ophelia's relationship. I believe that judgment and concerns from family members are vital to hear when in a committed relationship, however as an audience we can sense that Laertes and Polonius are not even allowing Ophelia the chance to experience love without criticism. As a young adult, relationships teach lessons, especially what an individual likes and dislikes. Ophelia has not been granted this time to fully synthesize her feelings and wrap her head around this relationship. While Laertes and Polonius do bring up the point that Hamlet may be "wooing" her with love vows and expressions of romance, it is not right for these two men to interfere with a natural human relationship. Their warning of Hamlet's nature is more a forceful "telling" than "warning," as though she is not able to make her own decisions as a young woman.

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Tuesday Nights

Every Tuesday my dad makes dinner...or at least orders salads from Garry's Grill. Its funny because for the longest time we would order Caesar Salad's with two sides of chicken (my grandma and myself) and two sides of Salmon (my mom and dad). But now... my dad has taken an interest in cooking! It began with shifting from buying salads with chicken to actually making  them! They were delicious. Ever since then, my dad has gotten very excited about making something new each Tuesday. At the beginning of the month he made a delicious vegetable soup that had been sitting on the stove for four hours! It is a family recipe that my Bubbie use to make... it's one of my favorites. I was shocked when I walked in the door that night because normally we have salads, so I asked "what did mom come home early?" Nope. Dad spent all day shopping and preparing this meal. I didn't think this would last, but last week on Tuesday, my dad sent me a snapchat while I was at rehearsal for the musical, and he was showing off two Lasagnas! One was ALL veggie, and the other was a regular lasagna. I personally chose to eat the all veggie one and it was amazing. I can't wait to see what my dad comes up with tonight.

Once Upon A Mattress




After four years of being a Water Street Player, I continue to say that the Severn School stage is my home. The relationships built through the preforming arts are invaluable, along with the chance to passion with the community. Once Upon A Mattress was a show unique to Severn, as the character development, comedic storyline and "Silly" aspect of the show has not been showcased in over five years. The character, Queen Aggravain, is a pompous, self-centered royal mess. Obsessed with the idea that she must conjure up impossible tests for princesses seeking her sons hand, Aggravain was such a fun character to play in the musical. Her attitude, words, and the way she carried herself felt as though she commanded the entire room every time I stepped on stage. Throughout the nearly 25 shows that I have participated in, I have never had as many lines to memorize. The several monologs were most definitely the greatest aspect of this character. Her rants to the wizard, "advice" to her son, and her attempt to get the princess to sleep were exciting to learn, as it presented opportunity to showcase my acting rather than my singing. While it took a long time to fully memorize the lines, it was more important to figure out which specific words I should accent, emphasize, speed up and slow down. I was fortunate enough to work with someone outside of school to workshop my character's attitude and how to expose the "mean" side of Aggravain. Reflecting upon the show, the cast and crew could not have put on a more wonderful show to end my high school.

Saturday, February 23, 2019

Why Read Shakespeare

In the lecture Why Read Shakespeare, spoken by Dr. Michael Mack,  he speaks primarily regarding the importance of Shakespeare's writing. Throughout the lecture, Mack touches on the idea that Shakespeare is difficult to comprehend for a variety of reasons. For a college student or a student in general, reading Shakespeare is "hard-work and not particularly rewarding." In addition, as Mack states, students claim that "[they] don't get it; is it really worth the effort?" In essence, this confusing language of Shakespeare is seemingly not applicable to his/her desired study in college and beyond. To address this specific difficulty, Dr. Michael Mack outlines throughout his lecture the reasons why students should read Shakespeare. The gratification of thoroughly understanding the language of Shakespeare is rewarding because the student has broken down the once "complexity" of his writing. Moreover, he uses the comparison of music, as we as humans learn something new each time we listen to a song...similarly to Shakespeare, as we re-read and fully comprehend the storyline we can more easily connect difficult abstract ideas into one understanding of his writing. In addition, Dr. Mack also explains that once a student "gets" Shakespeare, it provides him/her with a "lens on the real world" and even deeper, helps a student seek certain truths about their selves. Shakespeare's writing provides a deeper meaning of the world surrounding us, the hardships, joy, emotions, etc. Throughout Dr. Michael Mack's article, he presents five persuasive and convincing arguments to answer the question "Why read Shakespeare." The first argument is that it is "A Time for Developing Interests." In this section, Dr. Mack entails that college students should broaden their interest in Shakespeare because each time he/she analyzes Shakespeare's writing, he/she will discover something new and intriguing. While the storyline may be complex, the tidbits on information that are pieced together through a few read-throughs can be extremely appealing. The second argument that Mack states are that reading Shakespeare is "A Time for Exploring." Throughout this argument, Mack explains that Shakespeare provides students with writing that opens the eyes to the real world, and provides students the time to explore and analyze themselves. Moreover, this section specifies the importance of the beauty of Shakespeare and how this mirrors the idea that it is "proving ground" for exploring beauty in an individuals life. The third argument of Mack is that it is "A Time for Self-Knowledge" and concludes that Shakespeare grants a student the ability to understand themselves, as a student can borrow and develop ideas and thoughts from Shakespeare's writing. The fourth argument is that reading Shakespeare is "A Different Take on Skills" and emphasizes that Shakespeare's writing gives tools and skills that are useful in any career... he presents students with "soft skills" that provide the foundation for any job a student wishes to pursue. A baseline in liberal arts "teaches us to identify these natural tendencies and to correct them." The fifth and final argument is "There is Knowledge, and there is Knowledge" which explains that when a student understands their emotion connection between physical characteristics and emotional characteristics, this presents a full, well-rounded person; Shakespeare's writing offers a way to connect this complex idea of connecting thoughts to feelings. My favorite argument is "A Time for Exploring"mainly because I find that when I analyze Shakespeare, I have seen that he cleverly presents this mirror of society and societal aspects of the world. It intrigues me to the point where I find that each story I have read relates in some fashion to an event or emotion or place or group of people that exist or have existed in the world. In addition, I particularly enjoy the idea of how a reader can connect the beauty of Shakespeare to the beauty of life; Since literature is so intertwined with emotions, I sought that as an extremely fitting and valid argument.

Saturday, February 16, 2019

Roy -- Scared and Afraid

For a man with so much power and influence, it is surprising to see him in such a fearful state of mind when he is admitted to the hospital for AIDS. Moreover, it is shocking that for the duration of the play thus far, that no one but his doctor knows that he is dying of AIDS. What I found particularly interesting in this hospital scene was Belize's selfless act of kindness to help out Roy. While showering Belize with racist and homophobic slurs, not once does he let this affect his attitude toward the patient at hand. I believe that Roy's actions toward Belize are out of fear that he is going to die. It is as if this is when he fully realizes the seriousness of his illness and begins to accept his feelings for men. In addition, I think that Belize sees this fear from with Roy and recognizes that he is calling desperately for someone to help him stay alive. It was a brave scene for Belize, as he is confronted face on with someone who is crippling right in front of his eyes and while he is offended by Roy's words, he still chooses to help him by saying not to accept radiation for cancer. When this confrontation occurs, Roy, in a sense knows that he can not contain his secret much longer. His power can only take him so far and now he is faced with a decision to expose himself, knowing that his career could be shattered. During this era it was common for people to hid their true sexuality because it was not accepted in society. For this reason, a big lawyer like Roy feared that this image of him would be seen as weak, thus his desperation to get the experimental medicine proves he is trying to save his own life.

A Short Getaway

In a prior post, I was discussing the dysfunctional aspect of the character Harper in Angels In America. This week I wanted to revisit her, and her perspective of life particularly in the scene where she travels with Mr. Lies to Antartica. At first, I thought that it was quite odd to have an escape to somewhere so frigid and desolate. However, the more that I pondered over it I began to realize that this setting was perfect for her character. Desolation is what she needed...complete aloneness with the whole world open to her. In addition, the idea of Antartica being completely white/covered in snow is a symbol of purity and innocence to the audience, almost as if she is cleansing herself of all the twisted lies and terrible aspects of her real-life situation. Her all-white outfit too can be representative of this idea of stripping herself of her identity and reconnecting and reinventing herself. Harper is such a unique character because her true feelings and thoughts are heard primarily in these hallucinations. One thing that struck me as an audience member was when she felt that she needed a companion (i.e., the Eskimo). This companion, played by Joe's character, was incredibly fascinating to me. I believe that the pairing of Harper with the Eskimo could symbolize her lack of direction in the future coupled with her desire to salvage a dissipating marriage. I am eager to see what will happen with Joe and Harper's relationship as we move through this play. If I had to make assumptions, I would gather that this idea of aloneness foreshadows the future.





Saturday, February 9, 2019

A Father Figure

In Act Two Scene Four of Angels In America, Roy explains to Joe the importance of a Father-Son relationship. As Roy lectures to Joe about the importance of having someone older than you believe in you, we quickly learn that Joe's father was not a man that he felt any sort of connection with him as an adolescent. It is heartbreaking to Joe particularly as he ponders over the idea that he fails to have such support in his life, and immediately ties this sense of support to the idea that he is holding in a huge secret about his sexuality. We do not know for sure, but a reader could potentially assume that due to the idea that Joe's father did not love him might relate to the fact that he had to suppress his true feelings for men. In the conversation when Hannah and Joe speak over the phone, we learn that his mother does not approve of his sexuality and that his father never loved him. This conversation provides insight into the closed-minded, arrogant, and un-loving parents that Joe was raised by. Unfortunately, the two most valued people in the world ( a mother and father) are not the human beings Joe can run to in a crisis. It is comforting to see that Roy, in some ways, is trying to act as a fatherly figure, in my opinion. Some might say that Roy is sexually attracted to Joe, but I believe the vulnerability lies in the fact that Joe feels so alone and unwanted by a vast array of individuals that surround his everyday life.

Glimpse into Act Two Scene Nine

Throughout the play Angels In America, most of the scenes have been divided into specific conversations that exist between Harper and Joe and between Louis and Prior. The second to the final scene, however, provides the reader with all four characters talking as rapidly as possible in two separate locations. It is an interesting stylistic choice for the writer of this play to combine two climactic scenes of two completely different relationships. In my own opinion, it creates a sense of chaos, as if we as an audience are witnessing the most critical "fights" that have existed between Harper and Joe and Prior and Louis thus far. For Harper and Joe, Joe is deciding he needs to leave his wife. For Prior and Louis, it is Louis deciding to leave Prior. In this way, I believe the combination of these two scenes are incredibly effective at drawing the attention toward how drastically different, yet similar all four characters can be. In addition, it shines a light on the desire of freedom amongst one of the partners, while the other has a feeling of being trapped. Prior, literally confined within a hospital room, desperately wishes Louis would leave him to die. As an audience we see how much this pains him, sincerely hoping that Louis does not leave. To mimic this situation, Harper also wishes to get away as she asks Mr. Lies to take her far away from this confrontation of Joe admitting that he needs to leave, and never has loved her because he is gay. It is one of my favorite scenes in this play so far, as it is packed with underlying emotions such as Louis, who holds in a deep burning passion for love yet puts on a facade because he is frightened by the idea of death.

Tuesday, January 29, 2019

A Dysfunctional Woman

In the play Angels In America, the dysfunctional atmosphere of Harper and Joe's relationship evokes a hostile and eerie environment for this couple. Harper, immersed within her hallucinations, regularly swallows Valium pills and seemingly lives a duel life, as seen by the audience. To Joe, Harper is an odd woman, that keeps to herself, in the play thus far. The uniqueness of this play rests in the fact that only the audience is provided insight into Harper's twisted mind. The specific lens that we as readers/audience members can attest to allows us to cope with the lonely life of this woman who is breaking down inside. Her drug-induced hallucinations, present the real dilemmas and desires of Harper. For instance, when Mr. Lies comes to speak to Harper about "getting away" or traveling, a feeling of being trapped and alone is especially absorbed during this scene. The idea of leaving can be reflective of how Harper wishes to escape from herself and the world that she is confined within. Her relationship with Joe is failing as he is always going on long walks without her. In her encounter with an unfamiliar face (to her... not to the audience), Prior, he explains to her that Joe is homosexual. In my own opinion, although she has never met Prior, this is another instance where her feelings and intuitions roam freely, and other individuals are merely the voice that guides her to conclusions and desired fantasies. Toward the end of this act, it is interesting to see this transition from a woman who keeps to herself, to a woman who is confrontational when receiving this news about her spouse being gay. Her reaction contradicts every notion her previous character had imposed upon to the audience. For this reason, her character is complex, as there are still several layers the audience has yet to unfold. 


Saturday, January 26, 2019

Movies Then vs. Now

With WWII coming to a close, it was no doubt that the 50s and 60s screen's were filled with patriotism, heroism and pride. Film-makers created movies that would often rally people under a common feeling. This specific feeling could be pride, or sadness,  happiness or love. For instance, movies such as The Bridge on the River Kwai or Run Silent, Run Deep, captured action-packed scenes of war and the lives of soldiers. It is particularly interesting how it seems that older movies were more direct and to the point. The movie served a greater purpose...teaching lessons, emphasizing certain aspects of life, and exploring love and fantasy. The 50s and 60s were a time when movies drew crowds from all of the surrounding cities because they were drawn into this story that brought relief to stressful work days or post-war veterans. Movies during that time period were a pass-time for the American people. This is not to say that modern day movies are not, however, it is clear that certain films are merely released to stir controversies such as The Interview or present main characters that people are not fond of. Moreover, there is a lack of feeling... as if some movies are merely written just to put a famous actress or actor on screen, not to serve the greater good. The 50s and 60s used this platform to educate the public of what the war was like, or how other's can fall in love, versus today in a movie such as Crazy Rich Asian's were it emphasizes the effects of wealth in Asian countries. Overall, this contrast is clear from then to now, as it is unfortunate that film-makers today are seemly making films to just make money.

Lets all go to the movies!

The rush and excitement of a new movie film often drew crowds out to theaters all across the nation in the 1950s and 1960s. Actor's such as Paul Newman, Cary Grant, and Joanne Woodward captivated audience's into a romantic, dramatic, or action-packed story line. The movies created fantasies for the audience; men and women enjoyed seeing heroes conquer the world or the warm feeling of two people falling in love. The classic dinner and movie outing was extremely popular... eat a nice dinner and head to the evening showcase of North by Northwest. The magic of the movies today, however, has significantly diminished. In the comfort of your own home, women, men, and children can watch movies right on their T.V. screens... but forget TV's even... laptops, Ipads, and cell phones can now stream movies instantly at a remarkably low price! People in today's society would rather spend $4.99 to rent a movie than an average $9.00-$14.00 per person for the theater, and they can remain in pajamas or informal wear. Movie gathering now does not involve transportation, it is more personal, and a plethora of genres are at the tips of our fingers. So why not? It seems plausible to forget the theaters, reclining chairs, big screens and settle for an 8x11 inch screen just because we desire staying inside.  Older generations in modern day will always remember the excitement of the 50s and 60s as the drastic change of movie-going has altered the face of our society.

Sunday, December 9, 2018

Offending A Reader

In my own opinion I believe that the reader of a book has every right to have reservations regarding how certain characters, races, ethnicities, etc. are portrayed. As we discussed in class, the Vietnamese woman reading The Things They Carried found the book offensive and did not want to teach this book. I find it interesting, however, in how she argued that she believed that the book was shining light on all the flaws of Vietnam, yet the book rarely if at all dives into the culture, people, personalities, or even encounters with Vietnamese people. I feel very strongly that communities that should be represented and deserve a voice if the author feels as though it is of value to show different perspectives within the book. Consequently, in The Things They Carried, I believe O'Brien was not trying to capture diverse views, he was trying to tell his own story. Maybe this was a coping mechanism to get over certain stories he had trouble processing, or perhaps he felt that his story would show a glimpse inside his mind as a young child. Either way, this book was created to show the audience how an American soldier was not as brave as everyone thinks, or the weight they carry inside them; each individual carries with them something either hidden or in plain sight. If O'Brien were to add another component of describing the Vietnamese, who is to say that it would be accurate? How could he understand the everyday banter between the soldiers or the thoughts going on inside their heads? How would this embellish the story? I believe it would take away from his writing, as he wishes to tell stories that linger between Americans. His strong suit is the American side; wouldn't it be difficult to capture a perspective that he simply could not write about? I think that O'Brien is telling the stories he needed to tell rather than sugarcoating or lying in order to capture more perspectives. For these reasons, I do not believe that this story is particularly offensive, as it his personal accounts, although I could understand how it may be difficult for the Vietnamese woman to read an American's opinion.

Mary Anne's Character

I would honestly like to believe that Mary Anne is not a fictional character. While the possibility of journeying to Vietnam is seemingly impossible, O'Brien writes this compelling story in a way that makes the reader wonder, what is the real truth? In essence, the entirety of his book has the reader ask him or herself what is the truth? Mary Anne's bravery and spontaneous desire for fighting in war are what convinces me that she is a real character. I want to believe that a woman could accomplish fighting a war and showing other men that she is not afraid to cut her hair and cover her body in black ash. While I may question the route at which she reached her boyfriend, I entirely believe that the war took her in and taught her lessons that most if not all women at that time never had the opportunity to achieve. I find it extremely interesting the transformation that occurred, from a woman dressing in all pink and white with a bubbly personality to a woman who is in her army uniform, and laughing only at the things she truly finds funny. Mary Anne's character to me is one that shows me the true effects of war and how it has this unique ability to change a person forever. I believe that this is the change that Mary Anne was waiting for in her life, as a woman during this time was supposed to merely send love notes to her husband or boyfriend fighting in war. Her character breaks barriers that were not seen during this time. Her character shows ambition and determination that she does not need to live under the wing of her boyfriend, she can fight on her own and moreover be on her own. For this reason, I would have to say she is my favorite character.

Saturday, December 1, 2018

A Letter In The Mail

A letter in the mail can change a life. For me it's an acceptance letter; for O'Brien, it is a draft notice. In Tim O'Brien's chapter On the Rainy River, the writer exposes the fear of the draft. As O'Brien explains to the reader, his life was normal for a graduate of college. As O'Brien explains, he thought he was "too good for this war" (39).  I find it hard to wrap my head around the idea that if one is drafted, they are required to drop everything or every future endeavor to serve in the war. When analyzing this chapter, I agree that with O'Brien's logic that the government should implement a new system or requirement/law for choosing who should be selected to serve. I find it interesting that the government had/has such power over its people... and moreover that the government can alter a person's life. When reading the stories within The Things They Carried I tuck away in the back of my mind the thought that none of these stories would be created if O'Brien had not been drafted. In a way, his writing career may have ceased to exist, but at the same time, I wonder how his life would have turned out if he did attend Harvard for graduate school. The stories that he has shared with the reader are ones that have altered his perspective on life; they are experiences that the typical/ average person will never be able to understand fully. War evoked fear as well as an appreciation for life and death. I wonder if without being drafted that someone could understand life in this way. In my own opinion, I had grown up in society or generation where going into war is much different than when O'Brien was drafted. It is a rare occasion in today's day and age that I even hear talk of war and the experiences of the men and women serving nowadays. For me, the men and women that are serving are not my brothers or sisters or cousin, partly because they choose not to, but also because the draft is not something that is implemented at this time. For this reason, my perception of this idea of drafting is may be completely different than someone during the time of the Vietnam War. 

Stories

In Tim O'Brien's The Things They Carried the writer shares rather personal stories to the reader that expose the brutality, love, hatred, death and so much more within the war. One passage toward the beginning of this book that stood out to me was the following: " Forty-three years old, and the war occurred half a lifetime ago, and yet the remembering makes it now. And sometimes remembering will lead to a story, which makes it forever. That's what stories are for. Stories are for joining the past to the future. Stories are for those late hours in the night when you can't remember how you got from where you were to where you are. Stories are for eternity when memory is erased when there is nothing to remember except the story" (36). This passage reflects the sheer meaning of this book as a whole. Each story presented to the reader dives into the past of Tim O'Brien and how the war will always be engrained into his mind through the stories he shares and recalls. Whether it be a story he has never shared, such as pondering over the idea to flee to Canada, or the memories that lasted among his friends and the jokes regarding the things they carried with them, O'Brien creates this unique book to dive into the real encounters of the war. While a reader may never understand the true hardships of a soldier, he or she certainly can understand and appreciate that war is most definitely complex, and that even some stories should never be shared. Untold stories may be because the story could expose fear or cowardness. In my own experience, the stories that are passed down to me are much different than war stories, although they may hold similar weight in my heart. For instance, milestone memories my grandfather has told me about his childhood, I will always hold close to myself since it "joins the past to the future." This passage to me reflects how I perceive all of the nighttime tales my parents use to share with me and how my imagination drifted into a story each night. While my fairytales are entirely different than wartime stories, the idea that the words passed down from generation to generation and always remains intriguing and thoughtful is what is most important. Without stories, one may never catch a glimpse into another person's life or mind, or the troubles, pain, love, and happiness that he or she has experienced.

Sunday, November 18, 2018

I, Too

The poem, I, Too, by Langston Hughes, is a rather short poem, but within it are layers that unfold as I read it over and over again. Beginning with the line " I, too, sing America" was bold as the reader is introduced to the poem by this idea that the speaker feels the need to stand up for himself and fight for his role in America. It is evident in the second line that the reader finds out that the speaker is a black soldier, struggling to find his spot during wartime, as he is sent to the kitchen to eat, rather than with his own fellow Americans. In the second half of this stanza, however, he explains that he "laughs, eats well, and grows strong." I believe Hughes is revealing this sense of integrity and pride, even during times when the black soldier is faced with racial inequality. In the second half of the poem, Hughes entails that the next meal time he will sit in a spot and not move to go eat in the kitchen and that everyone will see "how beautiful he is" and that these other men will "be ashamed." In essence, this man is saying that he must be respected by his peers during the war, as they are all fighting for the same cause. I believe the writer put an altered version of the beginning line at the end " I, too am America" to show that he no longer just "sings" America but he is a part of the battle and rightfully deserves a place in his own country. While this poem has no rhyming scheme it is apparent that the writer wished to create a transformative poem, where between the first and last line, the speaker goes through a sort of transformation such as I can to I will. In this idea, the speaker transforms for merely singing of America to being America, as he gains the confidence to show everyone who he truly is regardless of his skin color. I find this poem extremely interesting because of the maturity and confidence gained in such a short amount of line.


Saturday, November 17, 2018

Trench Duty

Siegfried Sassoon poem, Trench Duty, is an extremely visual and harsh account of a soldier during his time during warfare. More specifically, he shows the brave account of trench warfare. The soldier's explanation of the war itself is extremely dark as Sassoon portrays combat as something brutal, savage, and unsettling. The stanza begins with “ shaken from sleep, and numbed and scarce awake” and throughout the entirety of the poem the soldier explains how he set out for the trench and battled. The first line in itself is intense, as the just the words "shaken" numbed" scarce" are actions that many disturbing. As the poem continues, it is almost as if the reader can follow the actions of the soldier as there is "rumbling and bumping" throughout the night or when he is "crawling on his belly through the wire." I find it interesting how Sassoon chose to create the poem in a way as though it was a story, just merely written down in a book. The rhyming scheme— aabbccddefefgg— is a unique way to present the story as it almost seems more intense as each line is building up to the next. Without this rhyming scheme, it would just be a story, flat, without certain emphasis on the soldier's experience. The ending, "Blank stars. I’m wide-awake; and some chap’s dead” is extremely powerful as the author contrast a man who is wide-awake with one who is no longer a week. It is clear that Sassoon is emphasizing the idea that one may never know who is coming out alive and who may die in an instant. In this case, our narrator is alive, but this idea represents the essence of war, that some soldiers will never get to see such "blank stars" ever again. This poem was extremely dark, as I feel the writer wished to show that trench duty is not desired since a soldier faces death at any moment.